Fight or Flight Review: Josh Hartnett Stars in an Aerospace Action Movie That Barely Gets off the Ground

Fight or Flight (2025) feels like it’s trying to play in the big leagues of modern action but without the distinctive characters, choreography, or creative spark to back it up. It’s neither grounded enough to be gritty nor wild enough to be fun. While Josh Hartnett remains an intriguing actor in the right roles, this isn’t one of them. It’s a forgettable detour in a genre full of better, more fully realized flights.

Fight or Flight (2025)
Fight or Flight (2025)

‘Fight or Flight’ Movie Review

Fight or Flight, directed by James Madigan in his feature debut, is a mid-altitude action thriller that never really gets off the runway. Starring Josh Hartnett as a grizzled mercenary named Lucas Reyes, the film pitches itself as a claustrophobic, high-stakes brawler at 30,000 feet—but it ends up feeling like a watered-down riff on better single-location action flicks like Bullet Train (even if that movie has its own issues). While the premise is solid and potentially ripe for thrills, the execution is both underwhelming and uninspired.

Hartnett, whose career has seen a recent resurgence thanks to roles in Oppenheimer, Trap, and Guy Ritchie’s Wrath of Man and Operation Fortune: Ruse de Guerre, feels somewhat miscast here. While he’s proven effective as a stoic, brooding presence, Fight or Flight calls on him to lean into a winking, self-aware persona that just doesn’t suit his strengths. The film wants him to be rugged and cool in a sardonic, almost meta-action hero kind of way—but it mostly comes off as hollow posturing.

The story follows Lucas as he boards a commercial flight on a covert mission to identify and protect a mysterious target codenamed “The Ghost.” Trouble is, there are several other mercenaries onboard with conflicting objectives, and they’re not above taking out Lucas to get what they want. It’s the kind of setup that practically begs for kinetic, inventive close-quarters action. Unfortunately, outside of a few standout skirmishes, most of the film gets bogged down in dull exposition, flat character interactions, and a plot stuffed with generic twists that go nowhere fast.

The comparison to David Leitch’s Bullet Train is inevitable, but largely unfair to that movie. While Bullet Train was far from perfect, at least it had the energy and ambition to juggle a colorful ensemble, whip-smart pacing, and outlandish choreography. Fight or Flight, by contrast, feels stripped of personality. Aside from Hartnett, the cast is largely forgettable, with side plots involving operatives on the ground (played by Katee Sackhoff and Julian Kostov) adding little intrigue or momentum. The script tries to surprise with revelations about “The Ghost,” but the emotional and narrative stakes remain frustratingly low.

Even more disappointing is that Madigan, whose previous work includes additional directing roles on Snake Eyes: G.I. Joe Origins and Transformers: Rise of the Beasts, seems to bring less stylistic flair here than those louder, more personality-driven projects. For a film set entirely on a plane, there’s a surprising lack of tension or atmosphere—it’s visually flat, rhythmically sluggish, and weighed down by a certain level of self-seriousness that undermines the potential for campy fun.

READ MORE MOVIE REVIEWS: Another Simple Favor, The Monkey, Wolf Man

Ultimately, Fight or Flight feels like it’s trying to play in the big leagues of modern action but without the distinctive characters, choreography, or creative spark to back it up. It’s neither grounded enough to be gritty nor wild enough to be fun. While Hartnett remains an intriguing actor in the right roles, this isn’t one of them. It’s a forgettable detour in a genre full of better, more fully realized flights.

Score: 4/10

Fight or Flight (2025)

Support Cinephile Corner

Cinephile Corner is dedicated to delivering insightful film criticism, thorough retrospectives, and comprehensive rankings that celebrate the art of cinema in all its forms. Our mission is to foster a deeper understanding and appreciation of film history, offering in-depth analysis and critical perspectives that go beyond the surface. Each movie review and ranking is crafted with a commitment to quality, accuracy, and timeliness, ensuring our readers always receive well-researched content that’s both informative and engaging.

As an independent publication, Cinephile Corner is driven by a passion for film and a dedication to maintaining an unbiased voice in an industry often shaped by trends and mainstream appeal. If you value our work and would like to support our mission, please consider donating via Ko-fi to help us keep Cinephile Corner alive and growing. Your support is invaluable—thank you for being a part of our journey in film exploration!